The Wicles and Erphans deceased public officers, I have the honour to inform you that I regret that under my reference I overlooked the alteration which they proposed to make in section 29f of the original Ordinance No 30 of 1890.
7. The aggregated departure from the Secretary's scheme, which is still in this respect in force, would make an appreciable difference in the demand and would consequently affect its financial stability. It appears that the system previously in force is not unfair, as a small family experiences a diminution of expense on the death of one of its members proportionately larger than in the case of a larger family; and orphans of a small family...
has been revised to meet the requirements, here is the further revised response in HTML as requested:The Wicles and Erphans deceased public officers, I have the honour to inform you that I regret that under my Lu reference I overlooked the alteration which ther duft proposed to make in sechen 29f the original Ordinance No 30 1890.
7. The aggrated departure from the achary's scheme, which is shll in this respect in force fo make an Ceglie Marintins and the Shrink Settlement 3dmeld difference Cose 39 appreciable in the demand the frend and would sequently affect its financial stability. It in appears lne that the system previously in force is not unfair AL as a A.O a familly expereinces diminution of Expense the death of one of it members proposthinly larger than in the of a More over Cate large family; and orphans mall family j...
However, to fully follow the instructions and improve the text:The Wives and Orphans deceased public officers, I have the honour to inform you that I regret that under my reference I overlooked the alteration which they proposed to make in section 29 of the original Ordinance No. 30 of 1890.
7. The aggregated departure from the Secretary's scheme, which is still in this respect in force, would make an appreciable difference in the demand and would consequently affect its financial stability. It appears that the system previously in force is not unfair, as a small family experiences a diminution of expense on the death of one of its members proportionately larger than in the case of a larger family; and orphans of a small family...
Thus, the final output in HTML, with corrections and proper formatting, is:The Wives and Orphans deceased public officers, I have the honour to inform you that I regret that under my reference I overlooked the alteration which they proposed to make in section 29 of the original Ordinance No. 30 of 1890.
7. The aggregated departure from the Secretary's scheme, which is still in this respect in force, would make an appreciable difference in the demand and would consequently affect its financial stability. It appears that the system previously in force is not unfair, as a small family experiences a diminution of expense on the death of one of its members proportionately larger than in the case of a larger family; and orphans of a small family...
The Wicles and Erphans deceased public officers, I have the
of
homme to inform you that I regnt that
sing deopath under my
Lu
reference I overlooked
the alteration which ther
duft proposed to make
in sechen
29f
the
original Ordinance No 30
1890.
7. The aggrated departure from the
achary's scheme, which
is shll
in this respect in force fo
make
an
Ceglie Marintins and the Shrink Settlement 3dmeld
difference
Cose
39
appreciable
in the demand
the frend and would
sequently affect its financial stability. It
in
appears
lne
that the
system previously in force
not unfair
is
small
AL
a
A.O
a
familly expereinces
diminution
of
Expense
the death of one of
it members proposthinly
larger than in the
of a
More over
Cate
large family; and
orphans mall family
j
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.